[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text.

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text.
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 01:46:20 -0700
In-reply-to: <20040516013348.6797.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com>
Mail-followup-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20040515224035.GS6978@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20040516013348.6797.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 06:33:48PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > Do there exist any elidable terminators that are not terminated by
> > end-of-text?
> 
> What do you mean? {ku} is an elidable terminator for {le}, but {le nu
> fa'o} is not a grammatical utterance, for example.

I don't mean what I thought I meant.  Nevermind, sorry.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi

References:
- Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text.
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text.
  - From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text.
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Double-checking: "bu bu"
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Exists?: elidable terminators not closed by end of text.
Next by thread: Double-checking: "bu bu"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread