[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Grammar: li paxa se nanca

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Grammar: li paxa se nanca
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <20040602174740.GS818@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> Both jbofihe and the official parser choke on "li paxa se nanca" but are
> fine with "li paxa nanca".  Does anyone know why?

LALR(1)? The parser gets to {li paxa se} and expects an operator?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

References:
- Grammar: li paxa se nanca
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

Prev by Date: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Previous by thread: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: Grammar: li paxa se nanca
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread