Re: [lojban] Re: fragment + i-jek

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:23:16AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> 
> > I'm assuming the official parser is wrong; fragments cannot be
> > joined by ijeks, but wanted to check.
> 
> It's wrong, or rather obsolete.  We used not to distinguish between i
> and ijek, grammatically, and the fixes to the official parser were
> lost.

OK.  Slightly wierder one:

lenu broda kei cu zemucu'o i ja lenu brode

That seems to be wrong, but why?  It's fine without the 'ja'.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi