[lojban] John Cowan's view on reification

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

My view on Lojban's view of reification:

Everything that a sumti refers to, not within the scope of a negation, is
reified.  That includes abstract le nu/lo nu things, le'e things, lo'e things,
and the works.  You may perhaps find an exception to this general principle,
but I can probably explain it away.

Ya happy now, rlpowell?


-- 
"We are lost, lost.  No name, no business, no Precious, nothing.  Only empty.
Only hungry: yes, we are hungry.  A few little fishes, nassty bony little
fishes, for a poor creature, and they say death.  So wise they are; so just,
so very just."  --Gollum        jcowan@reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/GSaulB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/