Re: [lojban] Re: Founders: ja'o and ni'ikri

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:00:05PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> 
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> 
> > The definition for ja'o mentions "ni'ikri", which is not in
> > NORALUJV.  It seems inherently contradictory to me; what was it
> > intended to mean?
> 
> I think it dates back to the days before the krici/jinvi
> distinction was clearly understood.  

OK.  So what would it mean with jinvi?

> In any event, the definition of "krici" as believing without
> evidence/proof is probably too strong: it should be more like
> believing with or without evidence/proof.

<nod>  Adding "regardless" to jbovlaste, barring BPFK objections.

(Thank goth; that's always bothered me.)

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/