[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: Founders: ja'o and ni'ikri
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Founders: ja'o and ni'ikri
- From: jordi mas <jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:34:20 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=w6hTMVVRDw/I9uFeMlIPsEDJeDB7c/ilfliV9u50CAvpd2Qk3smMxklRp9pYbBljnulinUw5mmG9W+XFxJrUEm4zhjIraNLusSDht4GCnjTcnIGc72wUVrEBBg0Bb6/FPIJ8IFQ5A1vDRzKUOi8FjN/tBeRiBO9d2sfilb+3zNI= ;
- In-reply-to: <20041223000949.GC20429@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
> Yes, but we also believe things *regardless* of
> proof, or things
> where we believe (heh) that proof exists but have
> not actually
> examined it ourselves. There are *lots* of those,
> and krici should
> cover them.
And there are also LOTS of beliefs that we don't
think *need* a proof. They are simply assumed because
everybody says so, or becuase everybody nearby seem to
believe them. Whoever tries to deny them, disproof
them or prove them is classed as a "freak" and becomes
an outcast. They seem to be outside the domain of
proof. Is {jinvi fo no} good enough for these?
--jordi
=====
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250