conlang works

[MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com]

In a message dated 5/5/2005 5:22:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> > It's interesting that Lojban beats Klingon by a mile in this
> > regard, as I believe that Klingon has many more fluent speakers
> > than Lojban.
>
> Dosen't surprise me in the slightest.  The problem is people's loose
> usage of the word "fluent".  Klingon's vocabulary is *incredibly*
> poor.  Much worse than Lojban's.  I've heard of at least one
> parent(s) who tried to raise their kids speaking Kling but
> failed/gave up because there were just too many things they couldn't
> talk about.
>
> -Robin


True on all counts (except I think I know what "fluent" means).

stevo