[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Supplicatory Model: "under conditions".
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [lojban] Re: Supplicatory Model: "under conditions".
- From: "opi_lauma" <opi_lauma@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:30:13 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Delivered-to: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=iJ7VZ1KKX+PC1Nsk+YHIpvWay+FRoBGOfJf5HK+33TTHeAXSr92oaul+T2hpocwO6+k7n7YGvUzhPgJ1zGzu/KwIjRV7i2FCnJBb4NiGg5Oob2A459RoC/mOnDcxJr1m;
- In-reply-to: <20050623075306.82038.qmail@web33405.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
- List-id: <lojban.yahoogroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In lojban@yahoogroups.com, Opi Lauma <opi_lauma@y...> wrote:
> > 2. The x4 of zgana describes those conditions that
> must > be in place for the bridi to be true.
> Usually, I think, one does not imply that filled
> arguments of selbri are conditions that MUST be in
> place for bridi to be true. It means that bridi can be
> true if we replace given argument by another one. So
> why do we need to think that zgana is exception from
> rooles? So x4 should be understand just as "condition
> under whcih" x1 observe x2. And it should not mean
> that under another conditions x1 can observe x2.
I wanted to say "And it should NOT mean that under another conditions
x1 canNOT observe x2."
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/