Re: [lojban] Re: Orthography

[Brandon Wirick <brandon@yrick.com>]

It certainly doesn't suck! Good idea on the vowels. Too bad it's
impossible to do that with only connected characters.

Maybe I can create an applet or something that generates orthographies
from a hex string. That way we can all play around with orthographies
and communicate along these lines:
"Check out this orthography: 4FA39F6..." 
"Ooh, I like what you did with {ty} and {dy}, but I think it would be
better if you did this: 4FA3C96..."

I'll get on that soon, or if anyone else is itching to do it, be my guest.

mu'omi'e.uirik.

On 9/5/05, Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:
> No doubt this image has other problems, but I tried to visualize a DSO in
> which vowels were horizontally symmetrical. Also, in this version I
> eliminated the characters made of two unattached vertical lines because
> those were a pain to write with. The red characters represent the original
> characters which were replaced. Here's the link:
>  http://www.nemorathwald.com/lojban/lcd_clock_alphabet.gif
>  Currently I'm drawing a chart of all possible arrangements of segments that
> can be in one character. I believe, but am not sure, that they are in binary
> code order. After I upload it, I'd like somebody who understands binary to
> number them in The Gimp or some such image program so we can use John's
> numbering scheme and reference the chart.
>  -epkat