Re: [lojban] Re: xorlo podcast

[John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>]

Well, no others have actively joined in of late.
The voting members of BPFK have voted for xorxes'
proposal but there was not an alternative
proposal before them and it is not clear that the
understood default was prelo rather than CLL-lo. 
There are features of xorlo that are not obvious
from the official proposal and, since they are
the strangest of the items, it would be
interesting to know whether the voters were aware
of them when voting and how they feel about them.
 & participated in earlier discussions but has
dropped out the last few year (he was important
in the development of prelo) 

--- Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:

> xorxes, John,
> has this been just a debate between you two? Is
> there a majority view on
> this among Lojbanists?
> -epkat
>