[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
other parsable languages
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: other parsable languages
- From: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:26:04 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nClQHB4ObqPX+CEPahOgW2vtlB7+BLnhPSs9a3KRSB/MW5Us6z+0fJRJKJW0+hFbQGVkGBg4c8hEY5f7sQXS4c1Yc8CaetoBDS7440yTmsMgJ1empAhDbLeNJFJ9CzMyJgy2arzG9U43Zu91E9SCjmQDAkwH6tdJSYGeFZTOC8o=
- Reply-to: Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
I know that Lojban is hailed as "parsable" by a computer, but does this
mean that it is merely parsed more easily? Or that no other language
has a complete YACC grammar? Can someone offer a little more detail to
someone who is not a specialist?
-Matt