[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
semantics
- Subject: semantics
- From: BestATN@xxx.xxx
- Date: Sun, 4 Apr 1999 13:40:50 EDT
I like the idea of defining gismu in terms of semantic primitives. Such
definitions should make it possible for machines to understand them and
better interact with people. Someone already mentioned defining common gismu
first, then using those gismu in later definitions. Seems like a good idea.
How about a Lojban dictionary in Lojban? There are lots of people on this
list, and if each one wrote a definition for a single gismu, a lot of
definitions would get written, especially if a format were chosen beforehand
to adhere to. Has anyone ever written *any* definition in Lojban? How did
it turn out?