Re: [lojb

[dex@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxx]

> I'm a Forth fanatic, actually -- but in order to make a Lojbanic 
> Forth we'd have to invent a pretty serious dialect of Lojban to
> handle the stack. It would be pretty cool, I admit, but I don't
> have the skill.
> 
> I suggested Rebol because it has most of the features of Forth,
> but it also has and uses a parser.

I've been out of touch for a long time (and haven't gotten the
FIG newsletter since the 1980s), but hasn't anybody written a
Forth parser? Maybe somebody at FIG would know. 

Do you have contact info? About all I remember at this point
is the snailing address used to be in California. (So long ago
we weren't even calling it Snail yet).