Re: [lojb

[dex@xxxxxxx.xxx.xxx]

> Prolog might be appropriate -- but there's been a lot of progress
> in the Logical Programming Languages field since its release, too. 
> Someday I'll get enough time to actually read up on that --
> hopefully after this set of finals is over.

Time there is never enough of; or rather it's infinite, but
we use it up at transfinite rates. 

Just in case I get some myself, though, what would you recommend
I read to come back up to speed?