Re: Lojban Orthography (has been several other things)

[Lionel Vidal <nessus@xxxxxxxxxx.xxxx]

* trevor hill (thill@Quark.Com)
> With regard to current world scripts, i really think hangul is the
> most 'logical' of scripts in existance today, from our perspective... I've
> wrestled repeatedly over the years to find ways to express more sounds in
> hangul, so as to adapt it to lojban, for instance, but have always been
> unsatisfied with the result..... :( I think we really should have people
> individually invent scripts of their own for lojban, and choose the best
> one... that would preserve the creative integrity of the script, and maybe
> we could come up with a really cool one.... ;)

Yes, I also think that a Hangul like script would suit most 'logically' our
perspective: one `character' (actually a group of syllabic entities) per gismu,
and one per cmavo would give a neat visual clue on the language structure.
But to get a clear script with a graphically pleasant effect is not that easy :-(

Lionel Vidal.