[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use and abuse of sets
- Subject: Re: Use and abuse of sets
- From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 08:43:58 PST
la djan cusku di'e
>But here's another example:
>
> mi ralju le'i fenki
> I am-the-chief-of a-specific-set-of crazy-ones.
> I am the bull goose loony [from _One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest_]
>
>Having a "chief member" is a set property.
Yes, according to the gismu list. But you could just as
clearly say: {mi ralju lei fenki} and there is no change
in meaning that I can detect. Requiring the x2 of ralju to
be exclusively a mathematical set does not make sense,
because there are many places that allow both sets and
masses. A serious distinction between masses and sets
would require that no place could take both, but that is
not the case in Lojban.
co'o mi'e xorxes
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com