Re: final clubs

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la xod cusku di'e

>A imposes no conditions. If A were the only final club, it would have
>to impose the condition of not joining any other final clubs that should
>arise later.
>
>But {B, C} forbid joining final clubs, according to the oath promising to
>swear no other oaths. So they are final.
>
>If you want to try to create a final club that doesn't swear any oaths,
>that goes against the definition. The mirror case is not valid.

This is how I interpreted first, but John says that if
Joining B precludes joining A, then joining A precludes
joining B. Otherwise, you have to argue against my other
definition, the one for asymmetrical preclusions. No fair
mixing examples like that.

co'o mi'e xorxes

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com