Re: [lojban] re: nazycau gerku

["michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>]

> From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
li'o
> la pycyn cusku di'e
>
> >How should I read the observatives (well, I don't suppose you can observe 
> a
> >perfective)?
li'o
> In this particular example I was not baffled by the
> "observative" (the elision of x1) but by the meaning.
> What does it mean for an idea to be over and done with?
> Is it no longer an idea? Or no longer held by x3?
> Or no longer being elaborated? What does {ba'o} really
> mean there?
li'o
je'e.a'a (Good point.) .i nu'o xagmau co skudji ledi'u sidbo
sepi'o zo skudji (I should've preferred "intended to say".) .i .u'eru'ero'a 
na vlacafne (I'm still not used to that word.)

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com