Re: [lojban] Lojban / Most translated Web Page

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la lojbab cusku di'e

> It is not as if such conventions could not work; rather it is
> not in the book (or any Lojban material) that way. Would a different
> convention be a baseline change? Would it contradict anything in the Book?

I couldn't find any mention of dates in the book. Only an
example of hours:minutes:seconds. So there seems to be no
baseline on that. It has to be decided by usage.

If you write the date in full, it doesn't matter which
convention you use, both are clear as long as you write
the four digits for the year. There is obviously a
demand by lojbanists for the 2000-05-07 format, which
is not surprising because it is in some sense the most
"logical".

co'o mi'e xorxes

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com