Re: [lojban] Re: lujvo

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

> From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
>
> lo LE the really is
> veridical descriptor: the one(s) that really
> 	is(are) ...
>
> The implication is that the speaker is insisting that such a thing
> really is.

That is what the speaker claims, but why would a claim that the
speaker makes and that you don't believe offend you? Only because
it is about some god, I suppose. Or are you offended by any
claim with which you disagree?

> Note that the specific vector of offense for me would be if someone used
> a generic expression like that ("one or more mothers of one or more
> gods") to refer specifically to Christianity and its mythology.

But that would be a grammatical mistake, {lo} is not used for
specific reference. It would offend my sense of the language too,
but not for religious reasons.

> The
> all-too-common assumption by Christians that their religion is the only
> relevant one pisses me off.

Me too, not just Christians, but majorities in general.

co'o mi'e xorxes


________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com