On 22 Sep, Pierre Abbat wrote: > >>You probably mean "zo pante" instead of "le pante". Otherwise, it's >>quite clear. As for that "e", the writer was trying to make "Indonesian >>DNS Central" a predicate... I think a "me" was in order there though. > > No, I meant that we should send complaints to at least one of the Indonesians > (who hasn't answered yet) and to DNS Central (who responded quickly with a form > letter). I don't know the end marker for a "noi" clause; such things should be > indicated in the cmavo list at the beginning marker. According to the EBNF grammar xref, NOI is in relative_clause_122, which has terminator KUhO. I agree, terminators should show in the grammar. > As to the missing attitudinal, I don't have the hang of attitudinals yet and > was too busy looking up other words. Actually, "me" is not an attitudinal. It changes sumti into simple selbri: x1 is one of the referents of "[sumti]". It turns out, however, that I was wrong about its use there. :) -- Taral <taral@taral.net> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
Attachment:
pgpjj5EsGKSjH.pgp
Description: PGP signature