On 23 Sep, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > We have "pe" and "ne", the first being restrictive, the second incidental. > Similarly "poi" and "noi". Now if I do the same thing to "po", I get "no", but > that means zero. So how do you express incidental possession? There's a bit in the Book on this... let me see... pages 174-5 deal with it... I can't find it right now. Oh, well. -- Taral <taral@taral.net> Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail.
Attachment:
pgpneOYRKppV2.pgp
Description: PGP signature