| In a message dated 3/3/2001 2:55:10 PM Central Standard Time,
jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: <ca'e ro mlatu cu danlu Does that speak to the definition of {mlatu}? of {danlu}? of both? of neither? Is it a statement about cats and animals The answers are mostly "yes" (Only "neither?" gets a "no") The next to the last is that the statement is about cats and animals says that all of the former are also among the latter. The {ca'e} merely places the source of your confidence in that claim in your understanding of relevant definitions, rather than, say, close and repeated observations or a wild guess. Note that, if you really based your claim on close and repeated observationsbut said {ca'e} anyhow, the claim would still be true, though you might be accused of being misleading or, perhaps, even of lying. |