[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] RE: Grammar Clarifications
At 04:33 AM 05/28/2001 -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
Well, "accept" isn't "agrees with" or even "understands." Does anyone
remember what RH's reasoning was? The main point, as I recall, for starting
the discussion back then was that JCB's original notion had gotten (quel
surprise!) pretty amorphous as he fit more and more things into his original
good idea. But the original idea was not so bad and I see that there is not
a replacement for it yet (xorxes' makes no coherent sense and lojbab's is not
a replacement).
I just looked on the Loglan web page and one possible discussions involving
me is
http://www.loglan.org/Lodtua/lodtua-92-3.html
But I seem to recall that you got the Lognet at issue (whether you can find
it at this stage may be another story).
I tried Jay's searchable archive, but it seems to not be working at the moment.
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org