| In a message dated 5/31/2001 1:46:49 PM Central Daylight Time,
rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes: <> <no da poi na du la .alsax. du lo pa cevni > > What's the problem?> > It's true if {noda du lo pa cevni} is and thus, inter alia, if there is some > number of cevni other than pa. But the book says that sayng 'lo pa cevni' states that there is only one Well, "states" is a little strong, since sumti don't state, but it doesmake its basic sentence false if there is no god or more than one. In those cases, {A du lo pa cevni} is false for every A, thus {no da du lo pa cevni} is true and so, a fortiori, is {no da poi li'o du lo pa cevni} |