[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals



I want to thank you all for starting the writing of my next section on
attitudinals.  I know I should have started with the "other-worldlies"  to
get them out of the way so that the rest would better fall under the
generalizations I start with, but I wasa in the midst of the discussion about
the cognitives and so it was easier to just carry that on and over.
I am less thankful for the "new" problem that you ahve presented about the
response use of some of the "other-worldlies."  Apparently it, not some of
the cases that I imagined as being left over from English, was the ambiguity
Lojbab and djan mentioned earlier.  I have to admit that I had never
considered these cases and can't think of good English examples to guide me
-- the lines always seem causal and assertive, not emotive (and so to
suggest, for example, a distinction between {pacna le du'u} and {pacna le nu}
-- though I am not sure which one is which).  
I dislike using the preceived truth or lack of the preoposition to
disambiguate, since it will disambiugate differnetly then for different
people, though I assume it is the speaker's view that strictly determines
which is meant.