[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: an approach to attitudinals



While I am not sure that the effect of attitudinals on truth values is the
most interesting question about them nor the best way to put the question
that is being asked under that rubric, it is the center of the present
discussion.  Permit me to try out a schema on this topic, classifying
attitudinals as
I Presupposing the attached bridi is true
      A. responding the claimed situation and its immediate, obvious,
"inevitable"    
            effects (pure emotions)
      B. responding to the possibilities it opens (I take it this is
Lojbab's hope)
II Not presupposing the attached bridi is true (maybe separated into no
      presupposition and presupposing false, but the next moves seem about
the
      same -- though may have different names
            Response if it were true (hope-fear)
            Evaluation (should)
            Commitment to its being true (wish - intend )
                  Involvement of others (suggestion - power based range of
petitions)

I'm not sure about the structure of this last bit, but I think this is
approximately correct.

Comments?