[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] selma'o



In a message dated 6/11/2001 2:19:59 PM Central Daylight Time,
ragnarok@pobox.com writes:



If about half of us agree not to even read the parts of the Book that
mention selma'o, and half of us memorize our selma'o, then can't we watch
the differences and get a very simple Sapir-Whorf test? I have some other
test ideas, but no way to do them without getting better at lojban. first.



Well, it wouldn't be a S-W test, since it is not about the language.  It
would be a test of different sorts of heuristics for learning the language,  
Selma'o -- or some similar devices -- are essential for writing a grammar of
the langauge, else we have at least as many rules as we have words. But they
are not part of the language; they may not even correspond to a native
speaker's intuitions about the structure of the language  -- though at least
some usually will.  If you don't find them a help in learning the language,
don't use 'em; if you do, do.  But one way or the other you have to learn
what can go where when in a sentence (which is about all a selma'o is -- some
are also phonologically defined).