[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE:{goi} addendum



The reason for the rule on double quantifiers that Lojban uses is almost
certainly the enormous difficulty within logic otherwise of saying something
like "Three men came into the saloon.  Two of them well to the bar.  One of
these ordered a lime rickey."  The straightforward logical form of this takes
up a half-a-dozen lines at least and even the shortened forms designed to
help logic over some of its problems with plurals (which Lojban shares to
some extent) and subsets is three or four times as long as the English.  The
Lojban is at least comparable to the English -- with the rule as given in the
book (which does require some binding adjustments even here), roughly  
ci da poi nanmu cu nerkal le barja .i re da zo'u ge da klama le barjyjbu gi
pa da minde tu'a zoi gy lime rickey gy.  (The last structure is required
because the shifted quantifier is officially local, shifting to the subjset
only for that one occurrence.)