In a message dated 8/3/2001 4:22:45 PM Central Daylight Time,
xod@sixgirls.org writes: ni'o I recall a while ago I offered an analogy of ka:ce'u::du'u:makau, yet But every {ka} seems to require a {ce'u}, implicitly or not, while most {du'u} don't have a {makau} or a {kau} of any sort. Also, the {du'u makau} reduces eventually to the referent of {makau} while the {ka ce'u} remains abstract, the property. |