[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Transliterations survey

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Transliterations survey
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 18:40:03 -0400
In-reply-to: <9kpq7t+kt1a@eGroups.com>
References: <9kpq7t+kt1a@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: phma@oltronics.net
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com

On Tue, 07 Aug 2001, A.W.T. wrote:
>> (magjaro joi ckipera li'o)
>
>Although written with "gy", the sound has nothing to do with "g" but a lot =
>with (palatal) "d", hence {madj(i)ar}. In order to get an 
>idea about the pronunciation go to my site and listen to some of the many H=
>ungarian poetry samples there.

I write "magjaro" because "madjaro" breaks apart, and "madiaro" and "magiaro"
are invalid.

phma

References:
- Re: Transliterations survey
  - From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

Prev by Date: RE: [lojban] ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Next by Date: RE: [lojban] ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Previous by thread: RE: [lojban] Re: Transliterations survey
Next by thread: Re: Transliterations survey
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread