In a message dated 8/9/2001 4:01:41 PM Central Daylight Time,
lojbab@lojban.org writes: Actually it did. lu'a for selecting individuals from a set came *directly* Yes, but the language uses were never written up (unless in a short bit in the newsletter) and are not in the Book. There are no specimens that I can find anywhere and Athelstan's proof even is lost from the material I have -- can you resurrect it? It is easy to see how the "exactly n" cases work, but what about more complex ones that lay out interrelationships among what occurs or does not? |