Jay Kominek wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, John Cowan wrote:
Originally "du" was in its own selma'o, DU, and was permitted only as a selbri_B_132 (IIRC). But I somewhat hastily over-generalized it into selma'o GOhA, thus permitting some highly dubious constructs like tanru with du.Highly dubious? It seems like it could be useful to make quick and imperfect statements about kinds of equality. {mi junta du do}
It would be better to use dunli in such a case. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein