[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful

To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 02:32:41 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010814072308.00bbd800@pop.cais.com>

I seem to have deleted the original message for this thread, but I
can't see much wrong with {selma'o}. If it is supposed to mean
precisely {se cmavo}, then why not say {se cmavo}? {vlakle}
could be used for the cmevla/brivla/cmavo tritomy.

--And.

References:
- Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
  - From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

Prev by Date: RE: [lojban] {kai'i}
Next by Date: RE: [lojban] lu'e (was: Re: ka + makau (was: ce'u (was: vliju'a
Previous by thread: Attitudes towards Lujvo (was: selma'o considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread