[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful

To: phma@oltronics.net
Subject: Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:28:20 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <01081708273409.05304@neofelis> from Pierre Abbat at "Aug 17, 2001 08:27:33 am"

Pierre Abbat scripsit:

> I think therefore that saske was a bad choice for that fu'ivla; it should be 
> ratnrkuarka.

Perhaps so.

> (kuarka is also a valid type-4 fu'ivla but would more likely be 
> used for the dairy product.)

Umm, what dairy product?

(This shows the dangers of Stage 4.)

-- 
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

References:
- Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

Prev by Date: Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: Literal and Metaphor (was: pages)
Previous by thread: Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread