[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Toward a {ce'u} record



In a message dated 8/19/2001 12:33:59 PM Central Daylight Time,
rob@twcny.rr.com writes:


self -love is le ka ce'uxino prami ce'uxino, which might be shortened
somehow
> (to, for example, {le ka prami ce'uxino}) but probably shouldn't be.

That's way too complicated. What's wrong with {le ka ce'u prami ri}?


I don't know; I didn't think of it.  Is it legal?  I don't see why not
immediately.  Is it generalizable?  Less clear, because of the vaguenss of
the {rV} series, but the {le nei} or {le no'u} (depending) series would
always work.  
Are there rules about anaphora of bound variables other than repetition
within scope?