Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 8/29/2001 3:48:55 PM Central Daylight Time,
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:

I suggest that you send to the list a new summary containing nothing
but the rules you think should be given a try. And give your proposal
a name.

The full monty version: put a ce'u in the first free place (place not
occupied by a content _expression_ -- this can always be the first place by
using SE or FA) and in every other place where {ce'u} is intended, if any.

Abbreviated version.  If there are only one or two {ce'u} make the first
place one of them and then omit the {ce'u}, put the other one in where wanted.
If there are more than two {ce'u} but not all places are {ce'u}, make the
first place {zo'e} and put {zo'e} wherever they are required.
{du'u} has no {ce'u} implied or overt.  All {ce'u}, write 'em all in.