| In a message dated 8/31/2001 12:08:25 PM Central Daylight Time,
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes: ., <le si'o ce'u broda be I apologize. I seem to have joined (against my intentions) the group that have taken {li'i} into the group with {si'o} and then slid from the obscurity about {li'i} to one about {si'o}. But just what does "the {ce'u} is a variable bound to le se li'i" mean? The first guess, again, is that it is just "replace {ce'u} by le se li'i," which makes sense, but seems unduly curcuitous. Another is that it means a variable whose range depends upon what is referred to by li se li'i -- my experience of the dark (I don't know where the {ce'u} is supposed to go here) is different from yours because what is unlit for me is different from for you? I guess I need some examples with explanation. I gather that, in fact, you don't think that {ce'u} as a lambda variable belongs in {li'i} and that I certainly agree with. I'm less clear what you do think belongs there, other than {zo'e} and content. |