| (I've got to start doing these at 3am when I am awake (unwillingly), not at
8pm when I am falling asleep) In a message dated 9/4/2001 8:30:01 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes: >{la bab dunli la bil lo ni ce'u clano}, {la dubias frica la tclsys lo mamte No, it wouldn't, any more than the {ka} requires that they differ in {le ka le babras mamte la dubias}. The 3rd place is a *function* -- from people to truth values in one case, from people to people in the other -- and dubias and tclsys differ precisely in that they give different value as arguments to these functions. So, if you accept {la dubias frica la tclsys lo ka makau mamte ce'u} or specifically {la dubias frica la tclsys le ka la babras mamte ce'u} then you have to accept {la dubias frica la tclsys le mamte be ce'u} on the same principle. Of course, I am not sure you completely accept the beginning stages of this argument. |