In a message dated 9/5/2001 6:17:37 PM Central Daylight Time,
jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:
>So, if you accept
>{la dubias frica la tclsys lo ka makau mamte ce'u} or specifically {la
>dubias
>frica la tclsys le ka la babras mamte ce'u} then you have to accept {la
>dubias frica la tclsys le mamte be ce'u} on the same principle.
I don't think that follows. I think {lo te frica} is a property,
not a person.
I couldn't agree more, which why I object to your objection: {le mamte be
ce'u} IS a property (more accurately a function, but the general point is the
same.)
|