In a message dated 9/14/2001 8:11:58 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:
As for Laadan, it
> is clearly too inchoate to be much use as a conlang.
Not too inchoate by Lojbab's standards. For Lojbab, the more inchoate the
better -- the more inchoate the language is, the more there is for Usage
to Decide.
Oh, even Lojbab (the one of your rhetoric even) would insist on a grammar and a phonology, neither of which doth Laadan possess in record.