[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] A revised ce'u proposal involving si'o



In a message dated 9/15/2001 6:18:18 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:


> > There indeed must be a way for a bridi to function as a sumti (tho it's
> > unclear to me why there must be a way for a bridi to function as a
> > selbri, which is what NU gives us), but the only NU that is indispensible
> > is du'u kei be zi'o. All other NU could be replaced by other selbri
> > with a du'u kei be zi'o sumti.
>
> A mysterious paragraph. Are you sure of it?

Yes. I can't see any snages.


How does it work? What, for example, replaces {ni} or (this is apparently crucial) {si'o}?  I think a chart for all the  NU is called for.