Re: [lojban] Re: noxemol ce'u

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 9/23/2001 9:12:09 AM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:

I haven't really been keeping up with this thread, partly because
I'm short of time and partly because on skimming it Jorge seems
to be saying everything I would wish said (so consider my voice
to be being implicitly added as an echo of Jorge's). But I just
want to chime in here to point out that I said that ce'u belongs to
the localmost bridi, and since {le mamta be ce'u} is not a bridi,
the ce'u is not 'confined' to that phrase; the ce'u belongs to the
bridi in which {le mamta be ce'u} is a sumti.

Sorry to have misrepresented you.  But  unfortunately, {ce'u} as a lambda variable is confinded to the limits of bridi fragment in this case: ^xg(x) is well-formed and takes precedence over ^xFg(x). which requires a separate form (put another way, the bridi fragment is a bridi, though not asserted -- but then none of the ones containing ce'u are asserted).