[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lojban] Re: ro prenu na ku daplu
At 12:34 AM 9/24/01 +0100, And Rosta wrote:
Nick:
> One thing: you're insisting on {zei} because you want to sidestep the
> potential ambiguity of tanru, or because you don't want to look up the Evil
> that is rafsi?
I don't want to use tanru. I don't want to look up short rafsi. And I
avoid 5-letter rafsi so as to make it easier for others to look up the
constituent parts. I also approve of lujvo glue as a matter of principle.
This sounds a bit strange, coming from someone who is arguing that we don't
have enough allowance for Zipfean shortening.
lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org