la .and. cusku di'e > I believe that the mainstream view among lojbanists is that everything > receives the extensional reading, except for LE du'u sumti, which are > intensional. Why would "le du'u <bridi>" be different from "le broda"? If 'le' always refers to the extension, then doesn't "le du'u <bridi>" refer to the extension of "du'u <bridi>"? mu'o mi'e .adam.