In a message dated 10/1/2001 9:38:34 AM Central Daylight Time, arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes:
Because "le" sumti can be exported to the outermost bridi (and beyond),
while "lo" sumti are quantified in the localmost bridi.
Where we do have 'intensional contexts' they consist of a bridi that
is sumti of an 'intensional predicate'. A lo sumti that occurs within
such a bridi cannot be exported out of it, and hence is confined to
the intensional context. The same is not true for "le".
You are right that both "le" and "lo" are in themselves extensional.
An interesting rule; whence cometh it?
mi senva le nu le melba cu cinba mi
|