In a message dated 10/1/2001 12:29:45 PM Central Daylight Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:
But something _is_ thrown out! We could no longer Well, no one has used it yet, so it can't exactly be thrown out, not yet being in. But moe to the point, we have a perfectly good way of saying it, so it is not lost -- and we gain a new thing we did not have before. <There's also the less important matter, but still significant, that while you get ^xf(x), there's no equivalent way of getting ^xf(g(x)). It just wouldn't fit with the rest of the language if ce'u had no prenex to hang from, and {le} does not provide one.> Now, this is a genuine problem, since I don't see how to get {ce'u goi cy zo'u} in with {le}, either before or after, unless I mess a bit with relative clauses, which look suspicious. Hmmmm |