Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e

[And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>]

Oh. Right. I see. Yes then. Sorry: I agree with you both.

--And.

>>> John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> 10/31/01 02:02pm >>>
And Rosta wrote:

>>>>Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com> 10/30/01 11:54pm >>>
>>>>
> #Could {zo'e} be defined perhaps as {lo'e du}?
> 
> Surely lo'e du treats everything as one single Mr Everything.


No, that would require a one-place predicate that is true of everything.
"lo'e du" means "lo'e du zo'e", Mr. Whatyouhadinmind.


-- 
Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com 
during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan 
in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel