| I think And and I agree in all but words. He would hold that Transformational Grammar is a device for relating sound strings to meaning and I would say that it might want to be but so far it has only gotten to relating sound strings to grmaatical structures, a necessary precursor to getting on to meaning (and the meaning part will be very different from the grammatical part). we also disagree on minor points, like how much of Lojban is settled and how much of natlangs are. But on the wholewe do agree (JHey, it happens sometimes). |