In a message dated 11/13/2001 6:02:29 PM Central Standard Time, jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:
>Well, now that that is decided -- {cnano} for empirical/statistical notions Well, cnano = x1 [value] is a norm/average in property/amount x2 (ka/ni) among x3(s) (set) by standard x4 So x1 is a number, probably a {ni} in most cases, x2 and x3 are the same as for {fadni}, x4 probably talks about how statistics were obtained, maybe something about how {ni} were assigned, if that is not obvious. Putting a normal object in x1 probably requires {tu'a}, to raise out of the abstraction (though it might not be a genuine abstraction in the case of, say, salary). The {tu'a} may be one reason for the {lo'e} circumlocution for many of these discussions. |